On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 21:41 +0400, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> I guess now I realized how you (and Nish)
> assume I could use it: is it that I
> should set CONFIG_HZ to the value I
> need at compile-time, and just remove
> all the timer reprogramming from the
> driver in a hope the dynamic-tick patch
> will slow it down itself when necessary?
The current implementations don't allow HZ to go higher than CONFIG_HZ
but that's the next logical step.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |