On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 20:21 +0400, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> perhaps allowing a single higher frequency, or allowing just any
> frequency, is pretty much the same task, and doesn't
> look achievable within the currently existing
> timer API anyway
Lots of things aren't doable with the current timer API, hence all the
recent work on dynamic tick. This driver would actually be a perfect
test for the dynamic tick system as your PC speaker driver basically
implements its own dynamic tick mechanism. Just replace all the PIT
reprogramming with itimers.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |