On Tuesday 16 August 2005 20:39, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Kern Sibbald <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 16:38:14 +0200
>
> > Someone is setting nonblocking on my socket !
>
> Glad that's resolved...
Yes, my stupidity. There was one more fcntl() in my source than I thought :-(
By the way, if a signal is delivered while blocked on a read, IMO, the OS
should return EINTR. If it doesn't, oh well, I'll live with it.
I wrote this code 5 years ago and was just now wondering why I bothered to
test on EAGAIN. Your comment about a signal causing EAGAIN to be returned
clarifies a lot.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|