* Lion Vollnhals ([email protected]) wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 14.08.2005, 09:29 -0400 schrieb Willem Riede: > > On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 20:54:35 +0000, Allen Martin wrote: > > That is disappointing. I was seriously considering a motherboard with your > > chipset because of its impressive specifications, but now I have to > > reconsider (I'm one of those folks that never bought an nVidia graphics > > board due to the lack of open full-function driver). I _hate_ not being > > able to use all features. > > I agree. > > I am considering buying an nForce4 board, too. > But i am discouraged by it's closed source nature. I also agree and am rather disappointed by this news. Unfortunately, I've already bought an A8N-SLI. I've been considering some nvidia-based systems for work though and now plan to ask my vendor (penguincomputing.com in this case) if this will be an issue with their systems or not. Thanks, Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NCQ support NVidia NForce4 (CK804) SATAII
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: NCQ support NVidia NForce4 (CK804) SATAII
- References:
- RE: NCQ support NVidia NForce4 (CK804) SATAII
- From: Willem Riede <[email protected]>
- RE: NCQ support NVidia NForce4 (CK804) SATAII
- From: Lion Vollnhals <[email protected]>
- RE: NCQ support NVidia NForce4 (CK804) SATAII
- Prev by Date: Vendor specific SCSI opcodes
- Next by Date: uart_port structure in serial8250_port[i] doesn't have the port_type values
- Previous by thread: RE: NCQ support NVidia NForce4 (CK804) SATAII
- Next by thread: Re: NCQ support NVidia NForce4 (CK804) SATAII
- Index(es):