On Aug 12, 2005, at 17:53:53, Steven Rostedt wrote:
Two more systems that are different from Linux. So far, Linux is the odd ball out.
Make that three more systems (Mac OS X has the same behavior as the BSDs):
zeus:~ kyle$ uname -aDarwin zeus.moffetthome.net 8.2.0 Darwin Kernel Version 8.2.0: Fri Jun 24 17:46:54 PDT 2005; root:xnu-792.2.4.obj~3/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc
zeus:~ kyle$ ./test_signal sa_mask blocks other signals SA_NODEFER does not block other signals SA_NODEFER does not affect sa_mask SA_NODEFER and sa_mask blocks sig !SA_NODEFER blocks sig SA_NODEFER does not block sig sa_mask blocks sig Cheers, Kyle Moffett -- Q: Why do programmers confuse Halloween and Christmas? A: Because OCT 31 == DEC 25. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Signal handling possibly wrong
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: Signal handling possibly wrong
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: Signal handling possibly wrong
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Fix i386 signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask (was: Re: Signal handling possibly wrong)
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask
- From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: Signal handling possibly wrong
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] [CIFS] Two small cifs patches
- Next by Date: Re: [Patch] Support UTF-8 scripts
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask
- Index(es):
