Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask

[Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>]

>Actually I take it the other way.  The wording is awful. But the "unless
>SA_NODEFER or SA_RESETHAND is set, and then including the signal being
>delivered".  This looks to me that it adds the signal being delivered to
>the blocked mask unless the SA_NODEFER or SA_RESETHAND is set. I kind of
>wonder if English is the native language of those that wrote this.  

So, if in doubt what is really meant - check which of the two/three/+ 
different behaviors the users out there favor most.



Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/