On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 17:56 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> * your stuff was accepted after all (and some stuff like ide-cd
> fixes was never splitted from the -ac patchset and submitted)
They were.
> * you've never provided any technical details on "the stuff I broke"
I did, several times. I had some detailed locking discussions with
Manfred and others on it as a result. The locking in the base IDE is
still broken, in fact its become worse - the random locking around
timing changes now causes some PIIX users to see double spinlock debug
with the base kernel as an example.
> > Would make sense, but I thought I had the right bits masked. Will take a
>
> WIN_RESTORE is send unconditionally (as it always was),
>
> This is not the right thing, somebody should go over all ATA/ATAPI
> drafts and come with the correct strategy of handling WIN_RESTORE.
Ok that would make sense. Matthew Garrett also reported some problems in
that area with suspend/resume (BIOS restoring its idea of things...)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |