[corrected akpm's address]
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:02:03PM -0700, John Ronciak wrote:
> Sorry this reply was to go to the whole list but only made it to Matt.
>
> The e1000_intr() routine already calls e1000_clean_tx_irq(). So
> what's the point of this patch? Am I missing something?
Here is Steven's original analysis:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/5/116
It looked plausible, but I didn't dig much deeper.
> > Index: l/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- l.orig/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c 2005-08-06 17:36:32.000000000 -0500
> > +++ l/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c 2005-08-06 17:55:01.000000000 -0500
> > @@ -3789,6 +3789,7 @@ e1000_netpoll(struct net_device *netdev)
> > struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > disable_irq(adapter->pdev->irq);
> > e1000_intr(adapter->pdev->irq, netdev, NULL);
> > + e1000_clean_tx_irq(adapter);
> > enable_irq(adapter->pdev->irq);
> > }
> > #endif
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |