Re: [PATCH 3/8] netpoll: e1000 netpoll tweak

[John Ronciak <john.ronciak@gmail.com>]

Sorry this reply was to go to the whole list but only made it to Matt.

The e1000_intr() routine already calls e1000_clean_tx_irq().  So
what's the point of this patch?  Am I missing something?

On 8/11/05, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:
> Suggested by Steven Rostedt, matches his patch included in e100.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
> 
> Index: l/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> ===================================================================
> --- l.orig/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c       2005-08-06 17:36:32.000000000 -0500
> +++ l/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c    2005-08-06 17:55:01.000000000 -0500
> @@ -3789,6 +3789,7 @@ e1000_netpoll(struct net_device *netdev)
>         struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
>         disable_irq(adapter->pdev->irq);
>         e1000_intr(adapter->pdev->irq, netdev, NULL);
> +       e1000_clean_tx_irq(adapter);
>         enable_irq(adapter->pdev->irq);
>  }
>  #endif
> 
> 


-- 
Cheers,
John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/