Re: [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables

[Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>]

On Saturday 30 July 2005 18:02, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 08:56:53PM +0200, blaisorblade@yahoo.it wrote:
> > As obvious, a "core code nice cleanup" is not a "stability-friendly
> > patch" so usual care applies.

> These look reasonable, as they are what we discussed in Ottawa.

> I'll put them in my tree and see if I see any problems.  I would
> suggest sending these in early after 2.6.13 if they seem OK.

I've discovered that we're not the only one to miss dirty / accessed 
"hardware" bits: see include/asm-alpha/pgtable.h (they don't have the 
accessed bit). So maybe we could drop the "fault-on-access" thing.

Also, note the comment before handle_pte_fault:
/*
 * These routines also need to handle stuff like marking pages dirty
 * and/or accessed for architectures that don't do it in hardware (most
 * RISC architectures).  The early dirtying is also good on the i386.
 */

I'm not able to find where we clean the dirty bit on a pte, however it's not 
only done by pte_mkclean, there are some macros like ptep_clear... in 
asm-generic/pgtable.h
-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade


	

	
		
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/