Re: [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables

On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 08:56:53PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> As obvious, a "core code nice cleanup" is not a "stability-friendly patch" so
> usual care applies.

These look reasonable, as they are what we discussed in Ottawa.

I'll put them in my tree and see if I see any problems.  I would
suggest sending these in early after 2.6.13 if they seem OK.

				Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables
  - From: Blaisorblade <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables
  - From: Blaisorblade <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables
  - From: Blaisorblade <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Re: [git patches] 2.4.x SATA update
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] 2/6 i386 serialize-msr
Previous by thread: [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables
Next by thread: Re: [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]