Re: [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables

On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 08:56:53PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> As obvious, a "core code nice cleanup" is not a "stability-friendly patch" so
> usual care applies.

These look reasonable, as they are what we discussed in Ottawa.

I'll put them in my tree and see if I see any problems.  I would
suggest sending these in early after 2.6.13 if they seem OK.

				Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables
    • From: Blaisorblade <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables
    • From: Blaisorblade <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables
    • From: Blaisorblade <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: [git patches] 2.4.x SATA update
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] 2/6 i386 serialize-msr
• Previous by thread: [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 1/3] uml: share page bits handling between 2 and 3 level pagetables
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]