* Zachary Amsden ([email protected]) wrote:
> Does Xen assume page aligned descriptor tables? I assume from this
Yes.
> patch and snippets I have gathered from others, that is a yes, and other
> things here imply that DT pages are not shadowed. If so, Xen itself
> must have live segments in the GDT pages, so how do you allocate space
> for the per-CPU GDT pages on SMP?
early during boot.
> I think introducing mach-xen headers is a bit premature though - lets
> get the interface nailed down first so that the hypervisor developers
> have time to settle the include/asm-i386/mach-xxx files without dealing
> unneeded churn onto the maintainers.
I don't think there's any point in putting mach-xen stuff in either.
Can we please discuss these patches in some sane way (say on the
virutalization list) so we're not cross-firing at each other. It's just
going to be too messy otherwiswe.
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |