Re: [PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c

--Chris Wright <[email protected]> wrote (on Sunday, August 07, 2005 16:44:11 -0700):

> * Martin J. Bligh ([email protected]) wrote:
>> Starting on the work to merge xen cleanly as a subarch.
>> Introduce make_pages_readonly and make_pages_writable where appropriate 
>> for Xen, defined as a no-op on other subarches. Same for 
> 
> Maybe this is a bad name, since make_pages_readonly/writable has
> intutitive meaning, and then is non-inutitively a no-op (for default).

You're welcome to suggest something else if you want, though it would
have been easier if you'd done it the first time you saw this patch,
not now. Going through this stuff multiple times is going to get very
boring very fast.

xen_make_pages_readonly / xen_make_pages_writable ?

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c
    • From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386 No-Idle-Hz aka Dynamic-Ticks 5
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]