On Friday 05 August 2005 20:46, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Dominik Karall wrote: > > On Friday 05 August 2005 17:22, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > please enable CONFIG_FRAME_POINTERS! > > > > I'm sorry, but I think I can't enable CONFIG_FRAME_POINTERS. > > Depends on: DEBUG_KERNEL && (X86 && !X86_64 || CRIS || M68K || M68KNOMMU > > || FRV || UML) > > > > Seems to be disabled for x86_64. > > It is disabled for x86_64, but not for any very good reason (beyond > reducing the test matrix). I work with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTERS on x86_64 > with no trouble, just add in the patch below, make oldconfig, choose > frame pointers and rebuild). But I can't guarantee it'll actually > reveal the info Ingo and all are longing to see. With FRAME_POINTERS enabled: BUG: mono[3193] exited with nonzero preempt_count 1! --------------------------- | preempt count: 00000001 ] | 1 level deep critical section nesting: ---------------------------------------- .. [<ffffffff80400a46>] .... _spin_lock+0x16/0x80 .....[<ffffffff801ed30c>] .. ( <= sys_semtimedop+0x28c/0x7c0) hth, let me know! dominik
Attachment:
pgpTUWHmSstHI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
- References:
- Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
- From: Dominik Karall <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
- From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] implicit declaration of function `page_cache_release'
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc5-gitNOW] msleep() cannot be used from interrupt
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] preempt-trace.patch (mono preempt-trace)
- Index(es):
