Quoting [email protected] ([email protected]):
> Quoting James Morris ([email protected]):
> > On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > > The attached patch implements your idea on top of my previous patchset.
> > > Following is performance data on a 16-way ppc. dbench and tbench were
> > > run 50 times, kernbench and reaim 10 times each; results are mean +/-
> > > 95% confidence half-interval. The 'static slot' kernel had a single
> > > static slot for selinux, plus the (unused in this case) shared struct
> > > hlist_head security.
> >
> > Can you also compare with no stacker at all (i.e. just SELinux with caps
> > as secondary module) ?
>
> Will do.
>
> I'll try to get a full set of numbers by next week, comparing:
>
> no stacker
> "original" stacker
> stacker with one shared slot
> stacker with two shared slots
Obviously, I meant to say stacker with one static slot (and one shared
slot), and stacker with two static slots (and one shared slot) :)
thanks,
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |