On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > > a clean way. It cannot even deliver the functionality it was designed to > > deliver (see BIND). > > That seems like a unfair description to me. While things are not > perfect they are definitely not as bad as you're trying to paint them. Sorry this went to far in the heat of the discussion. But the BIND functionality is truly not where its supposed to be. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- NUMA policy interface
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: NUMA policy interface
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: NUMA policy interface
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: NUMA policy interface
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: NUMA policy interface
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: NUMA policy interface
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: NUMA policy interface
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: NUMA policy interface
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 1/8] IA64: convert kcalloc to kzalloc
- Next by Date: [PATCH 6/8] drivers: convert kcalloc to kzalloc
- Previous by thread: Re: NUMA policy interface
- Next by thread: Re: NUMA policy interface
- Index(es):
