On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> None of them seem very attractive to me. I would prefer to just
> not support external accesses keeping things lean and fast.
That is a surprising statement given what we just discussed. Things
are not lean and fast but weirdly screwed up. The policy layer is
significantly impacted by historical contingencies rather than designed in
a clean way. It cannot even deliver the functionality it was designed to
deliver (see BIND).
> Individual physical page migration is quite different from
> address space migration.
Address space migration? That is something new in this discussion. So
could you explain what you mean by that? I have looked at page migration
in a variety of contexts and could not see much difference.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |