Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy

On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:48:55AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Paul Jackson wrote:
> 
> > Would it make sense for you to do the same thing, when displaying
> > mempolicies in /proc/<pid>/numa_policy?
> 
> Here is a new rev of the conversions patch. Thanks for all the feedback:

I really hate this whole /proc/<pid>/numa_policy thing. /proc/<pid>/maps
was imho always a desaster (hard to parse, slow etc.). Also external
access of NUMA policies has interesting locking issues. I intentionally
didn't add something like that when I designed the original
NUMA API. Please don't add it.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [04/13] x86_64 memleak from malicious 32bit elf program
• Next by Date: Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]