On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 09:25 am, Peter Williams wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 22:01, Gabriel Devenyi wrote:
> >>You haven't quite completely fixed the SD calculations it seems:
> >>
> >>
> >>--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated---
> >>Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU
> >>None 2.44 +/- nan 48.6 98.7
> >>Video 12.8 +/- nan 55.2 89
> >>X 89.7 +/- nan 494 52.8
> >>Burn 400 +/- nan 1004 20.1
> >>Write 49.2 +/- nan 343 67.2
> >>Read 4.14 +/- nan 56.7 96.7
> >>Compile 551 +/- nan 1369 15.4
> >>
> >>:(
> >
> > I keep trying
>
> The problem is a variation of the original one that I pointed out. The
> value that's being added to the sum of the squares of the latency is not
> always the square of the value being added to the latency.
>
> Would you like me to fix it and send you a patch?
I fixed that too in what is in front of me (sorry not the one I've released it
was only clear to me when this report came back) and am still hitting some
bug somewhere. I've yet to track it down.
Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |