On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 04:15:29PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 09:56:46AM -0400, Martin Hicks wrote:
> >
> > Here's the promised sysctl to dump a node's pagecache. Please review!
> >
> > This patch depends on the zone reclaim atomic ops cleanup:
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-mm&m=112307646306476&w=2
>
> Doesn't numactl --bind=node memhog nodesize-someslack do the same?
>
> It just might kick in the oom killer if someslack is too small
> or someone has unfreeable data there. But then there should be
> already an sysctl to turn that one off.
Doesn't the memhog hack also cause the machine to swap a lot? The
zone_reclaim() path doesn't let the memory reclaim code swap.
mh
--
Martin Hicks || Silicon Graphics Inc. || [email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|