the patch below removes sys_set_zone_reclaim() for now. While i'm sure
Martin is trying to solve a real problem, we must not hard-code an
incomplete and insufficient approach into a syscall, because syscalls
are pretty much for eternity. I am quite strongly convinced that this
syscall must not hit v2.6.13 in its current form.
Firstly, the syscall lacks basic syscall design: e.g. it allows the
global setting of VM policy for unprivileged users. (!) [ Imagine an
Oracle installation and a SAP installation on the same NUMA box fighting
over the 'optimal' setting for this flag. What will they do? Will they
try to set the flag to their own preferred value every second or so? ]
Secondly, it was added based on a single datapoint from Martin:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-mm&m=111763597218177&w=2
where Martin characterizes the numbers the following way:
' Run-to-run variability for "make -j" is huge, so these numbers aren't
terribly useful except to see that with reclaim the benchmark still
finishes in a reasonable amount of time. '
in other words: the fundamental problem has likely not been solved, only
a tendential move into the right direction has been observed, and a
handful of numbers were picked out of a set of hugely variable results,
without showing the variability data. How much variance is there
run-to-run?
I'd really suggest to first walk the walk and see what's needed to get
stable & predictable kernel compilation numbers on that NUMA box, before
adding random syscalls to tune a particular aspect of the VM ... which
approach might not even matter once the whole picture has been analyzed
and understood!
The third, most important point is that the syscall exposes VM tuning
internals in a completely unstructured way. What sense does it make to
have a _GLOBAL_ per-node setting for 'should we go to another node for
reclaim'? If then it might make sense to do this per-app, via numalib or
so.
the patch below is minimalistic in that it doesnt remove the syscall and
the underlying infrastructure changes, only the user-visible changes. We
could perhaps add a CAP_SYS_ADMIN-only sysctl for this hack, a'ka
/proc/sys/vm/swappiness, but even that looks quite counterproductive
when the generic approach is that we are trying to reduce the number of
external factors in the VM balance picture.
Ingo
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
arch/i386/kernel/syscall_table.S | 2 +-
arch/ia64/kernel/entry.S | 2 +-
kernel/sys_ni.c | 1 -
3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux-sched-curr/arch/i386/kernel/syscall_table.S
===================================================================
--- linux-sched-curr.orig/arch/i386/kernel/syscall_table.S
+++ linux-sched-curr/arch/i386/kernel/syscall_table.S
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ ENTRY(sys_call_table)
.long sys_io_submit
.long sys_io_cancel
.long sys_fadvise64 /* 250 */
- .long sys_set_zone_reclaim
+ .long sys_ni_syscall
.long sys_exit_group
.long sys_lookup_dcookie
.long sys_epoll_create
Index: linux-sched-curr/arch/ia64/kernel/entry.S
===================================================================
--- linux-sched-curr.orig/arch/ia64/kernel/entry.S
+++ linux-sched-curr/arch/ia64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -1573,7 +1573,7 @@ sys_call_table:
data8 sys_keyctl
data8 sys_ioprio_set
data8 sys_ioprio_get // 1275
- data8 sys_set_zone_reclaim
+ data8 sys_ni_syscall
data8 sys_inotify_init
data8 sys_inotify_add_watch
data8 sys_inotify_rm_watch
Index: linux-sched-curr/kernel/sys_ni.c
===================================================================
--- linux-sched-curr.orig/kernel/sys_ni.c
+++ linux-sched-curr/kernel/sys_ni.c
@@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ cond_syscall(sys_request_key);
cond_syscall(sys_keyctl);
cond_syscall(compat_sys_keyctl);
cond_syscall(compat_sys_socketcall);
-cond_syscall(sys_set_zone_reclaim);
cond_syscall(sys_inotify_init);
cond_syscall(sys_inotify_add_watch);
cond_syscall(sys_inotify_rm_watch);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |