Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01

On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 19:58 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> The stack trace should show where the problem is . If it's in the kernel
> we will see kernel functions before do_IRQ() , if it's just a whacked
> out task then do_IRQ() would be first in the stack trace . 

The problem is not differentiating tho output as kernel or user, I just
don't want too many false positives.

> 
> I can't speak for everyone else, but I would want to catch both. That
> way we'll know if it's just a whacked out task, or a kernel problem.

The thing is, it may be OK for a RT process to run in userspace for 10
seconds without sleeping.  If this is the case, you will constantly get
this output saying you may mave a bug. But if the kernel is running for
10 seconds without scheduling, I strongly believe that is a bug.  Unless
someone has some special driver thread, I don't know of any kernel path
that runs for 10 seconds without going back to userspace or sleeping.

I still wish there was a nice arch-independent way to tell if the task
is running in user space from do_IRQ.  Maybe there is?  I'll post
another thread and ask the question.

-- Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add Documentation/kprobes.txt
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/14] GFS
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]