Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 14:22 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Ingo,
> 
> What's with the "BUG: possible soft lockup detected on CPU..."? I'm
> getting a bunch of them from the IDE interrupt.  It's not locking up,
> but it does things that probably do take some time.  Is this really
> necessary? Here's an example dump:
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> Note: I added the curr=%s:%d,current->comm,current->pid just to see who
> was at fault. 

It means that IRQ 14 is running for a long time as an RT task .. btw,
the curr=%s:%d information duplicates some in the "show all held locks"
section .

I could base it off current_sched_time() to only trigger if the task has
actually been running for 10 seconds, instead of just assuming that it
has..

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux