>> >I've built a test set of kernels with the same configuration as the
>> >bzImage6, but changed the Processor family. Below is a list of the
>> >build. I'm interested in which ones would make a difference. I would
>> >think that the 386 version would probable work on all hardware, but
>> >at what cost in performance for creating and restoring the disk
>> >images. G4L uses basically dd, gzip, lzop, bzop, ncftpget, and
>> >ncftpput. With all these images, the g4l iso image is 50MB.
>>
>> And now? Where's the question... :)
>
>I want to provide users of the G4L program with
>the best options for the users.
>If having all the kernels is the only
>way to provide the best options, I will have to have the users
>download 50MB iso images. If I can get a good package with fewer
>kernels that would make the image smaller.
>So, to get a wide range of kernels to support various hardware, what
>would be the best.
The standard 586. That's what most distro [have to] use.
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |