Re: [patch 0/2] sched: reduce locking

* Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> I've had these patches around for a while, and I'd like to
> get rid of them. They could possibly even go in 2.6.13.

Looks good. Regarding timeline: unless 2.6.13 reopens (due to whatever 
delay), these should not get into 2.6.13 - but they are perfectly fine 
for -mm and for 2.6.14.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 0/2] sched: reduce locking
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: RFE: console_blank_hook that calls userspace helper
• Next by Date: [patch 2/2] sched: reduce locking in periodic balancing
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/2] sched: reduce locking in newidle balancing
• Next by thread: [PATCH] no-idle-hz aka dynamic ticks
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]