Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers

On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 12:18 -0400, James Bruce wrote:
> Yes, Lee needs to chill a bit.  I'll hopefully explain our position 
> calmly enough below.

I am a bit frustrated because when I first objected to 250HZ as the
default, I was told to come up with some numbers.  Now we have the
numbers, and they overwhelmingly show that 250HZ WILL hurt interactivity
and WILL NOT save anyone any power in real life.  But now the 250HZ
people have changed their position to "yes, we KNOW we're screwing over
multimedia users for the sake of laptop users, and we DON'T CARE about
your numbers."

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
    • From: Marc Ballarin <[email protected]>
  • Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
    • From: James Bruce <[email protected]>
  • Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
    • From: James Bruce <[email protected]>
  • Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
    • From: David Weinehall <[email protected]>
  • Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
    • From: James Bruce <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.12.3 Oops
• Next by Date: Re: PROBLEM: "drive appears confused" and "irq 18: nobody cared!"
• Previous by thread: Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
• Next by thread: Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]