On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 23:03 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> Also, as I said earlier, the better we support OSPM initiated power
> management, the more likely APM will break. This may be technically
> unavoidable on some isolated boxes without quirks. I agree with
> Pavel that "do nothing" may make sense, but it seems some devices
> may still need to be disabled by the OS. As a real world example,
> we currently can't turn off cardbus bridges because it breaks APM
> on a couple of older laptops.
Won't freeing of IRQs cause problems with things like handhelds that
actually rely on an interrupt to wake up ?
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|