On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 03:46:10AM -0300, Francisco Figueiredo Jr. wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > "Francisco Figueiredo Jr." <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>
> >>>"Francisco Figueiredo Jr." <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>udev S 00000002 0 1312 1 1224 (NOTLB)
> >>>>c1653f4c 00000082 c1653f3c 00000002 00000001 00000040 c1653f64 c1653f0c
> >>>> c016611b bfec96a8 c1653f0c 00000040 00000000 00000361 000241ed
> >>>>c13fb520
> >>>> 00000001 00001a7e 98f9769f 00000002 c146e520 df5da020 df5da148
> >>>>c13fbf60
> >>>>Call Trace:
> >>>> [<c016611b>] cp_new_stat+0x15f/0x17a
> >>>> [<c0352a74>] schedule_timeout+0x54/0xa2
> >>>> [<c01274ce>] process_timeout+0x0/0x9
> >>>> [<c01275c4>] sys_nanosleep+0xdd/0x18e
> >>>> [<c0102e85>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Well there's your delay: you've started running userspace and udev is
> >>>running. Yes, it takes a long time.
> >>>
> >>>What makes you think this isn't normal behaviour? Do other kernels behave
> >>>differently with the same userspace setup?
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>That's the point. On kernel 2.6.11 on same box I have no delay. It is
> >>instantaneous. On 2.6.12-rc1 it was instantaneous but I didn't use it
> >>much because I had drm problems. Later I tried 2.6.12 final and it was
> >>hanging. I saw the "seeing a minute plugs hangs" on 2.6.13-rc1 release
> >>notes and thought this could be the problem, but I compiled it and tried
> >>with no luck :(
> >>
> >>Now, I'm thinking it could be something like the udev hang which
> >>disapeared with udev update to 058.
> >>
> >>I don't know what can be happening. I think it is because of some type
> >>of timeout.
> >>
> >>If you think there is something else I can do, please let me know.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Greg said in another thread: "older versions of udev (< 058) can work
> > _really slow_ with 2.6.12. Please upgrade your version of udev and see if
> > that solves the issue or not.".
> >
> > What version are you running? Looks like 058, yes?
>
>
> Yeap. It is 058.
Hm, odd. Well, as this is a udev issue, care to try 064? We've fixed a
lot of little bugs since 058 that might have caused this.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |