Re: [PATCH] Wireless Security Lock driver.

*Grrr* - it's the mailer (I'm using Mozilla Thunderbird).   I don't
know why it has chosen to fold those two lines.

The section looks like:

+	struct usb_wsl *wsl=urb->context;
+	int id=0, retval;
+
+	switch (urb->status) {
+	case -ECONNRESET:

/brian

Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:

On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Brian Schau wrote:

Hi Michael (and others),


Thanks for the info.   Well, the reason why I didn't inline the patch
was due to the size of it - in terms of lines.   However, here it is:

+static void wsl_irq_in(struct urb *urb, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	struct usb_wsl *wsl=urb->context;
+	int id=0, retval;
+	+	switch (urb->status) { <==========
+	case -ECONNRESET:

There is something wrong with your patch or mailer.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Wireless Security Lock driver.
    • From: Michael Krufky <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Wireless Security Lock driver.
    • From: Brian Schau <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Wireless Security Lock driver.
    • From: Michael Krufky <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Wireless Security Lock driver.
    • From: Brian Schau <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Wireless Security Lock driver.
    • From: Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: about "SIGRT_0 (Unknown signal 32)"
• Next by Date: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Wireless Security Lock driver.
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Wireless Security Lock driver.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]