Re: [PATCH] Wireless Security Lock driver.

On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Brian Schau wrote:

> Hi Michael (and others),
> 
> 
> Thanks for the info.   Well, the reason why I didn't inline the patch
> was due to the size of it - in terms of lines.   However, here it is:

> +static void wsl_irq_in(struct urb *urb, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	struct usb_wsl *wsl=urb->context;
> +	int id=0, retval;
> +	+	switch (urb->status) { <==========
> +	case -ECONNRESET:

There is something wrong with your patch or mailer.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Wireless Security Lock driver.
    • From: Brian Schau <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Wireless Security Lock driver.
    • From: Brian Schau <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Wireless Security Lock driver.
    • From: Michael Krufky <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Wireless Security Lock driver.
    • From: Brian Schau <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] String conversions for memory policy
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.12 sound problem
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Wireless Security Lock driver.
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Wireless Security Lock driver.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]