On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 08:22:42AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> I replaced sharp functions with ucb_1x00 functions this way; I hope I
> did not mess it up.
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/battery-collie.c b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/battery-collie.c
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/battery-collie.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/battery-collie.c
> -
> - ucb1200_set_io(COLLIE_TC35143_GPIO_BBAT_ON, COLLIE_TC35143_IODAT_LOW);
> - ucb1200_set_io(COLLIE_TC35143_GPIO_MBAT_ON, COLLIE_TC35143_IODAT_HIGH);
> - voltage = ucb1200_get_adc_value(ADC_REQ_ID, COLLIE_TC35143_ADC_BAT_VOL);
> + ucb1x00_io_write(NULL, 0, COLLIE_TC35143_GPIO_BBAT_ON);
> + ucb1x00_io_write(NULL, COLLIE_TC35143_GPIO_MBAT_ON, 0);
> + voltage = ucb1x00_adc_read(NULL, COLLIE_TC35143_ADC_BAT_VOL, UCB_SYNC);
This won't work. You can't pass NULL to functions that take a pointer
and expect them to work. Look back at my patch set, at the way the
ucb1x00-assabet patch does this.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |