* Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>processes 1 2 3 4
> >>
> >>2.6.13-rc4: 187, 183, 179 260, 259, 256 340, 320, 349 504, 496, 500
> >>no wake-bal: 180, 180, 177 254, 254, 253 268, 270, 348 345, 290, 500
> >>
> >>Numbers are MB/s, higher is better.
> >
> >
> >what type of network was used - localhost or a real one?
> >
>
> Localhost. Yeah it isn't a real world test, but it does show the
> erratic behaviour without wake affine.
yeah - fine enough. (It's not representative for IO workloads, but it's
representative for local IPC workloads, just wanted to know precisely
which workload it is.)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |