Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:processes 1 2 3 4 2.6.13-rc4: 187, 183, 179 260, 259, 256 340, 320, 349 504, 496, 500 no wake-bal: 180, 180, 177 254, 254, 253 268, 270, 348 345, 290, 500 Numbers are MB/s, higher is better.what type of network was used - localhost or a real one?
Localhost. Yeah it isn't a real world test, but it does show the erratic behaviour without wake affine. I don't have a setup with multiple fast network adapters otherwise I would have run a similar test using a real network.Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags
- References:
- RE: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags
- From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <[email protected]>
- Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- RE: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags
- Prev by Date: Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags
- Next by Date: Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags
- Previous by thread: Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags
- Next by thread: Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags
- Index(es):
