Quoting r. Greg KH <[email protected]>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/xx/pci: remap_pfn_range -> io_remap_pfn_range
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 01:32:00AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Greg, Martin, does the following make sense?
> > If it does, should other architectures be updated as well?
> >
> Hm, you do realize that io_remap_pfn_range() is the same thing as
> remap_pfn_range() on i386, right?
>
> So, why would this patch change anything?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
It doesnt change any behaviour.
Its a style issue I'm trying to fix: even in arch specific code, isnt it better
to use a generic io_remap_pfn_range to map PCI memory?
--
MST
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |