Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH] arch/xx/pci: remap_pfn_range -> io_remap_pfn_range

On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 09:30:17PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
>     Greg> Hm, you do realize that io_remap_pfn_range() is the same
>     Greg> thing as remap_pfn_range() on i386, right?
> 
>     Greg> So, why would this patch change anything?
> 
> It's not the same thing under Xen.  I think this patch fixes userspace
> access to PCI memory for XenLinux.

But Xen is a separate arch, and hence, will get different pci arch
specific functions, right?

In short, what is this patch trying to fix?  What is the problem anyone
is seeing with the existing code?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] arch/xx/pci: remap_pfn_range -> io_remap_pfn_range
  - From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] arch/xx/pci: remap_pfn_range -> io_remap_pfn_range
  - From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH] arch/xx/pci: remap_pfn_range -> io_remap_pfn_range
  - From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Add the ability to unbind drivers to devices from userspace
Next by Date: Re: Fix up qla2xxx configuration bogosity
Previous by thread: Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH] arch/xx/pci: remap_pfn_range -> io_remap_pfn_range
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] arch/xx/pci: remap_pfn_range -> io_remap_pfn_range
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]