On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 01:19:00PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > return objp;
> > > }
> > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_alloc_node);
> > >
> > > #endif
> >
> > Even though we don't currently have in-module users, we probably will do so
> > soon and it's a part of the slab API and the slab API is exported to
> > modules. I don't see much point in partially-exporting the API and
> > applying a patch which we'll soon revert.
> >
> > Christoph?
> >
>
> I fully agree. Drivers will have to use that call in the future in order
> to properly place their control structures. The e1000 in your tree already
> does so and may be compiled as a module. Thus applying this patch will
> break mm.
I don't see e1000 in 2.6.13-rc3-mm2 using it.
And yes, I tried compilation of as much as possible (including e1000) in
2.6.13-rc3-mm2 with my patch applied before resending it.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|