Re: [SOLVED ?] VIA KT400 + Kernel 2.6.12 + IO-APIC + ehci_hcd = IRQ trouble

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:39:26 +0200, Michel Bouissou <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Yes, but it doesn't tell us why kernels 2.4x felt perfectly happy with the old 
>BIOS...
You turned off 4k stacks?  I have a Via KM400 chipset box locked 
up a few times, once under 2.4.31-hf2 after 4.5 hours compiling 
kernels, fixed with some .config tuning.  Done 48+ hours continuous 
compiling kernels with 2.6.12.3 + 8k stacks, load ~2.2.  Just adding 
a datapoint...  Dunno if this relevant.  Simpler, older box with 
Intel 440BX chipset is happy with 4k stacks, only 2 USB ports.

Grant.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [SOLVED ?] VIA KT400 + Kernel 2.6.12 + IO-APIC + ehci_hcd = IRQ trouble
    • From: Alan Stern <[email protected]>
  • Re: [SOLVED ?] VIA KT400 + Kernel 2.6.12 + IO-APIC + ehci_hcd = IRQ trouble
    • From: Michel Bouissou <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: 2.6.12 sound problem
• Next by Date: Re: PATCH: Assume PM Timer to be reliable on broken board/BIOS
• Previous by thread: Re: [SOLVED ?] VIA KT400 + Kernel 2.6.12 + IO-APIC + ehci_hcd = IRQ trouble
• Next by thread: [PATCH] add NULL short circuit to fb_dealloc_cmap()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]