Trond Myklebust wrote:
må den 25.07.2005 Klokka 17:56 (+0200) skreiv Rene Scharfe:
What's your opinion of the following patch, which explicitly states the
intent of nfs_block_bits()? It still needs patch 1 and 2.
I really don't like the choice of name. If you feel you must change the
name, then make it something like nfs_blocksize_align(). That describes
its function, instead of the implementation details.
I would agree. Was there really a driving requirement to change the name?
Thanx...
ps
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|