Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?

[Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>]

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> That beein said I wish LTT folks would make a little more progress so
> we could actually include it.

We're working on it. On the topic of revamping LTT, 3 different people
came up with 3 different implementations.

Following your feedback on the patch I sent a few weeks back, I headed
out asking myself "what is the bare-minimum tracing functionality that
will actually fly while still being flexible enough to add to it?" I
spent some time at the OLS comparing notes with others interested in this
area, and I think we've got something that should fit the bill. We should
be able to post something sooner rather than later.

Now if only I could remember what I talked about after I left the Black
Thorn at 2h45am and the guy in the elevator at Les Suites pressed on a
button and said "'M' for more beer" ...

Thanks,

Karim
-- 
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || karim@opersys.com || 1-866-677-4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/