Another vote in favor of relayfs here ...
I am reminded by my good colleagues at SGI that relayfs is a key
to the Linux Trace Toolkit (LTT), which is in turn an important
technology for some product(s) on which SGI is working.
It is uses such as this which speak to the value of including
relayfs in the kernel.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- relayfs as infrastructure, ltt, systemtap, diskstat
- From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- References:
- Merging relayfs?
- From: Tom Zanussi <[email protected]>
- relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
- Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: Tom Zanussi <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: Tom Zanussi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
- Merging relayfs?
- Prev by Date: slow tcp acks on loopback device
- Next by Date: Re: slow tcp acks on loopback device
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- Next by thread: relayfs as infrastructure, ltt, systemtap, diskstat
- Index(es):
