On Monday 25 July 2005 12:38, Brian Gerst wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Greetings;
>>
>> I just built what I thought was 2.6.12.3, but my script got a
>> tummy ache because I didn't check the Makefile's EXTRA_VERSION,
>> which was set to .2 in the .2 patch. Now my 2.6.12 modules will
>> need a refresh build. :(
>>
>> So whats the proper patching sequence to build a 2.6.12.3?
>
>The dot-release patches are not incremental. You apply each one to
> the base 2.6.12 tree.
>
Thats what I thought, and I blew that tree away & rebuilt it again
using the same script, and it worked. Go figure...
Thanks Brian.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.35% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |