Re: Question re the dot releases such as 2.6.12.3

Gene Heskett wrote:

Greetings;

I just built what I thought was 2.6.12.3, but my script got a tummy ache because I didn't check the Makefile's EXTRA_VERSION, which was set to .2 in the .2 patch. Now my 2.6.12 modules will need a refresh build. :(

So whats the proper patching sequence to build a 2.6.12.3?

The dot-release patches are not incremental. You apply each one to the base 2.6.12 tree.

--
				Brian Gerst
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Question re the dot releases such as 2.6.12.3
    • From: Kurt Wall <[email protected]>
  • Re: Question re the dot releases such as 2.6.12.3
    • From: Gene Heskett <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Question re the dot releases such as 2.6.12.3
    • From: Gene Heskett <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: do_gettimeofday monotony?
• Next by Date: Re: Kernel cached memory
• Previous by thread: Question re the dot releases such as 2.6.12.3
• Next by thread: Re: Question re the dot releases such as 2.6.12.3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]