Netlink connector

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, David S. Miller wrote:

From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:14:55 +0400

Andrew has no objection against connector and it lives in -mm

A patch sitting in -mm has zero significance.

The significance I think is that Andrew is trying to gently encourage some further progress in the area.

I recall some netconf discussion about TIPC over Netlink, or more likely a variation thereof, which may be a better way forward.

It's cool stuff http://tipc.sourceforge.net/


- James
--
James Morris
<[email protected]>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Netlink connector
    • From: Harald Welte <[email protected]>
  • Re: Netlink connector
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] 1 Wire drivers illegally overload NETLINK_NFLOG
    • From: Harald Welte <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] 1 Wire drivers illegally overload NETLINK_NFLOG
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] 1 Wire drivers illegally overload NETLINK_NFLOG
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [patch 05/24] Add usb_to_input_id
• Next by Date: [patch 08/24] input: make name, phys and uniq const char
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] 1 Wire drivers illegally overload NETLINK_NFLOG
• Next by thread: Re: Netlink connector
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]