(was Re: [PATCH] 1 Wire drivers illegally overload NETLINK_NFLOG) Fw: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

["David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>]

Well, this may be the reason why Evgeniy thinks nobody
has any concrete objections to his connector layer :-(

--- Begin Message ---

• To: davem@davemloft.net
• Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
• From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@sunset.davemloft.net>
• Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:18:01 -0700
• Auto-submitted: auto-generated
• Delivery-date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:18:01 -0700
• Envelope-to: davem@davemloft.net

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

  johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru
    SMTP error from remote mail server after initial connection:
    host mailer.campus.mipt.ru [194.85.82.4]: 554 mailer.campus.mipt.ru ESMTP not accepting messages

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path: <davem@davemloft.net>
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=davem)
	by sunset.davemloft.net with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1DwsXV-0007pe-24; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:17:57 -0700
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20050724.191756.105797967.davem@davemloft.net>
To: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru
Cc: laforge@netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 1 Wire drivers illegally overload NETLINK_NFLOG
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050723091455.GA12015@2ka.mipt.ru>
References: <20050723125427.GA11177@rama>
	<20050723091455.GA12015@2ka.mipt.ru>
X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:14:55 +0400

> Andrew has no objection against connector and it lives in -mm

A patch sitting in -mm has zero significance.  A lot of junk
and useless things end up there as often Andrew incorporates
just about every single patch he sees posted to linux-kernel
unless he personally knows of some reason why the change might
be wrong.

So "it's in -mm" is not a metric to use.

> All objections against it was only type of - "I do not like it"
> Dmitry had some bugfixes which were added.

People like James Morris had very specific objections about it.

You are a control freak and in general very very difficult to work
with, so nobody wants to help you fix things up.

--- End Message ---