On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 10:33:21PM +0200, bert hubert wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 01:01:32PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote: > > Another vote in favor of relayfs here ... > > At OLS the 'SystemTAP' idea was presented, which has been partially > implemented already, and it builds on relayfs as well. It dovetails nicely > with kprobes. And what exactly is this systemtap thing supposed to be? And why the heck do they announce it at some conference and we should suddenly care about it? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
- Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: Tom Zanussi <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: Tom Zanussi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- relayfs as infrastructure, ltt, systemtap, diskstat
- From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
- relayfs documentation sucks?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add schedule_timeout_{interruptible,uninterruptible}{,_msecs}() interfaces
- Previous by thread: relayfs as infrastructure, ltt, systemtap, diskstat
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- Index(es):
