Bert wrote: > the diskstat tools require relayfs That way might lay the real value of relayfs, as a common technology basis for specific tools that are developed and maintained on top of relayfs. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Merging relayfs?
- From: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@us.ibm.com>
- relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@us.ibm.com>
- [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@us.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Merging relayfs?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Remove Comtrol mail address from MAINTAINERS [next 1 address]
- Next by Date: [announce] 'patchview' ver. 002
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- Index(es):
