Bert wrote:
> the diskstat tools require relayfs
That way might lay the real value of relayfs, as a common
technology basis for specific tools that are developed
and maintained on top of relayfs.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Merging relayfs?
- From: Tom Zanussi <[email protected]>
- relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
- Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: Tom Zanussi <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: Tom Zanussi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
- Merging relayfs?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Remove Comtrol mail address from MAINTAINERS [next 1 address]
- Next by Date: [announce] 'patchview' ver. 002
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks?
- Index(es):
