Shailabh wrote:
> So if the current CPU controller
> implementation is considered too intrusive/unacceptable, it can be
> reworked or (and we certainly hope not) even rejected in perpetuity.
It is certainly reasonable that you would hope such.
But this hypothetical possibility concerns me a little. Where would
that leave CKRM, if it was in the mainline kernel, but there was no CPU
controller in the mainline kernel? Wouldn't that be a rather serious
problem for many users of CKRM if they wanted to work on mainline
kernels?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |