Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:02:36 +0200 Pavel Machek wrote:
> will not help. It seems like your machine is simply not able to do
> reasonable powersaving.

Digging up this patch from last month regarding C2 on a AMD K7 implies
that the whole blame can be put on kernel acpi:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111933745131301&w=2

Mvh
Mats Johannesson
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
    • From: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>

• References:
  • 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
    • From: Voluspa <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
    • From: Voluspa <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: fastboot, diskstat
• Next by Date: [PATCH] reset VGA adapters via BIOS on resume... (non-fbdev/con)
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]