On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:02:36 +0200 Pavel Machek wrote: > will not help. It seems like your machine is simply not able to do > reasonable powersaving. Digging up this patch from last month regarding C2 on a AMD K7 implies that the whole blame can be put on kernel acpi: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111933745131301&w=2 Mvh Mats Johannesson -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
- From: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
- References:
- 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
- From: Voluspa <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
- From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
- From: Voluspa <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
- Prev by Date: Re: fastboot, diskstat
- Next by Date: [PATCH] reset VGA adapters via BIOS on resume... (non-fbdev/con)
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
- Index(es):
