On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 03:01:56PM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote: > Still, for basic compile testing and testing patches on other > architectures it would be nice, when the patch writer can test his/her > patch with a simple defconfig, without knowing a common platform for > this target arch. This is what KBUILD_DEFCONFIG is for. A general purpose defconfig that has no hope of being kept up-to-date is worse than useless. > arm is another one which uses this style, ia64 for example uses configs/* > and defconfig. But on arm and sh `make defconfig` works contrary to v850. > That's because it looks at KBUILD_DEFCONFIG.. We absolutely do not want to have an arch/foo/defconfig for most of these architectures, and I doubt that v850 is an exception. Note that sh also does not have one.
Attachment:
pgpFG0hNQpsrA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- defconfig for v850, please
- From: Jan Dittmer <[email protected]>
- Re: defconfig for v850, please
- From: Miles Bader <[email protected]>
- Re: defconfig for v850, please
- From: Jan Dittmer <[email protected]>
- Re: defconfig for v850, please
- From: Miles Bader <[email protected]>
- Re: defconfig for v850, please
- From: Paul Mundt <[email protected]>
- Re: defconfig for v850, please
- From: Jan Dittmer <[email protected]>
- defconfig for v850, please
- Prev by Date: Re: Sandisk Compact Flash
- Next by Date: Re: Memory Management
- Previous by thread: Re: defconfig for v850, please
- Next by thread: inotify - i dont get a inotify device
- Index(es):