On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 07:56 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 16:46 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I haven't tested it recently . This was on an older version of RT > > > though . I could try it if it's interesting ? Or do you think it's > > > already fixed? > > > > it would be definitely interesting to see how robust the latest IO-APIC > > code is. > > I'm sure you test that all the time, but I'll try it .. I tried it, and it appears to be fixed in current RT .. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
- References:
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
- From: Karsten Wiese <[email protected]>
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mb_cache_shrink() frees unexpected caches
- Next by Date: Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes
- Previous by thread: Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
- Next by thread: Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
- Index(es):